Category:
Author:
A review of Turkey and Europe:
Challenges and Opportunities. Edited By: Adam Szymanski. Publisher: The
Polish Institute of International Affairs, Warsaw, 2012.
Turkey, geographically,
politically and culturally, is a complicated country that has a number of
problems including the Kurdish issue, the rise of political Islam,
democratisation, economy, civil-military relations and disputes with
neighbouring countries. In addition, relations between the European Union and
Turkey contain numerous controversial issues such as Cyprus, religion, democracy,
economy and Turkish foreign policy. Conversely, due to its strategic location
and cultural heritage, Turkey can provide many advantages to the members of the
EU in terms of economy and energy.
As a result of this
dilemma, understanding EU-Turkey relations can become problematic for students
in the area of International Relations and Political Science. Turkey and
Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, makes a significant contribution to
this ongoing debate by inquiring into challenges including the Kurdish issue,
economy, religion and the Cyprus problem, as well as the economic, security and
energy opportunities. Written by Polish specialists on Turkey at the Polish
Institute of International Affairs (PISM),
the book also offers readers a comprehensive look at the politics, democracy,
foreign relations, and history of Turkey. Additionally, throughout the book,
the authors make very cogent use of charts to illustrate data and condense
their arguments. That is not to say that the text of the book is a bit
complicated. In contrast, the book gets its message across very clearly, reads
very easily, and thus can be a very helpful source for wider audiences than
academia.
Turkey and Europe:
Challenges and Opportunities is composed of two parts;
as well as an introduction and a conclusion section. In the introduction, Adam
Szymanski discusses the key problems of Turkey on its road to the EU, and the
opportunities offered by Turkish membership for the EU's foreign policy.
According to Szymanski, although Turkey adopted numerous economic and political
reforms in the period between 2001 and 2005 in order to fulfil the Copenhagen
Criteria, the Cyprus issue, Turkey's domestic problems and an anti-Turkish
campaign led by France, Austria and Germany has slowed down the accession
process of Turkey after 2006.
The first two chapters of
the first part primarily analyse democracy in Turkey through the Kurdish issue
and the banning of political parties. Joanna Bocheńska does not only focus on
how minority rights in Turkey are problematic for the EU, but also analyses the
historical background and recent developments about the Kurdish issue through
the "deep state", Turkish army, "Kemalism" and (lack of)
constitutional provisions on Kurdish politics and culture. The following
chapter mainly examines the economy of Turkey, which, according to the author,
is potentially significant for the EU. However, the author also claims that the
"Turkish economy is still capital-intensive and underdeveloped
technologically" and "the process of meeting the Copenhagen economic
criteria has not been fully completed".
In the following chapter,
Szymanski analyses "religion" as an unofficial condition for EU
membership. Based on discourses of right wing parties about Islam, immigration
and racism, he argues that not only radical right wing political parties, but
also centre-right politicians including Sarkozy and Merkel, have always used anti-Turkish
rhetoric to strength their power.
The last two chapters of the first part focus on the most
difficult political problem between the EU and Turkey: Cyprus. On the one hand,
"Turkish Cypriots" is one of the most sensitive issues for the
Turkish people. On the other hand, Cyprus represented by "Greek
Cypriots" is a member country that can easily block the membership process
of Turkey. Based on this argument, these chapters mainly analyse how the Cyprus
issue has affected the EU-Turkey relations since 2004.
The next part primarily
examines Turkey's foreign policy in the Caucasus, Middle East, western Balkans
and Central Asia as well as the importance of energy for the EU. This part
provides a framework of the Turkish foreign policy before the period of the
Justice and Development Party (AKP) and explains how the AKP has changed the
Turkish Foreign Policy landscape. The new foreign policy principles of the AKP
are based on the "strategic depth doctrine" primarily aimed at
establishing good relations with neighbours, an active foreign policy,
resolution of disputes in the region and becoming a role model for countries in
the region. These principles are compatible with the purposes of external
relations of the EU in establishing security and peace in the region, as Turkey
has tried to become a transit corridor in its territory for oil and gas.
Therefore, as explained in detail in this part, Turkey can provide the EU with
a way of becoming significantly less dependent on Russian energy.
As explained in the
chapters that analyse Turkey's relations with Middle East, Caucasus, Central
Asia, and the western Balkans, Turkey aims to improve regional security and
peace in the region, which are also compatible with the European Neighbourhood
Policy. Based on the strategic depth doctrine, Turkey has attempted to solve
disputes not only with Armenia, Syria and Greece but also in conflicts between
Israel-Palestine, Syria-Israel, Bosnia-Serbia, Georgia-Russia and Iran-United
States. The chapters of this part comprehensively analyse these attempts and
show how Turkey's role could be beneficial for the EU in terms of security.
Moreover, this part focuses on cultural factors based on Islam, history and
ethnicity that make Turkey an important player to use its soft power in the
Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia.
In the concluding chapter, Szymanski argues that the
problems between the EU and Turkey are highly complex and there is not a simple
way of solving them. In addition, he claims that Turkey's membership process is
not based on the "accept or reject" dilemma, since Turkey is a key
country for making the EU a global actor.
Lastly, Szymanski offers four steps for reinforcing
EU-Turkey relations. In short, these include defining objectives, priorities
and expectations of Turkey and the EU, improving institutional mechanisms, and
considering third states in the region. Szymanski, however, notes that Turkey's
problems on its road to EU membership will only be solved in the long-term,
since Turkey continues to have several domestic and external problems.
The weaknesses of the study remain trivial. One weakness
stems from the fact that almost each chapter of the second part repetitively
explains the foreign policy principles of the AKP. Secondly, although Szymanski
and other authors make some critiques on the AKP, they take the AKP as the most
European centric party in Turkey. However, after 2010 when a constitutional
referendum took place, the AKP, based on Islamic movements, started to take
some steps to weaken the secularism in Turkey. Such actions as introducing
religious courses in schools, allowing headscarves in state organisations and
increasing the budget of religious institutions in Turkey can be cited in this
case. In addition, the AKP stopped the democratisation process of Turkey,
because, as many scholars and journalists in Turkey argue, it took control over
the military institutions, which had been the most powerful rival of the AKP
until 2010.
Democracy is still problematic in Turkey, as over hundreds
of journalists, over thousands of Kurdish politicians and many Kemalist
politicians still remain in prison. Therefore, when considering the problems of
the EU membership process of Turkey, the AKP should be analysed as a crucial
factor that slows down the relations between the EU and Turkey.
Halil Senturk - Dokuz Eylul
University, Turkey.
� f " V%
�v ontpagemag.com/2012/joseph-klein/turkey-the-worlds-leader-in-jailing-journalists/">http://frontpagemag.com/2012/joseph-klein/turkey-the-worlds-leader-in-jailing-journalists/
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Παρακαλούνται οι φίλοι που καταθέτουν τις απόψεις τους να χρησιμοποιούν ψευδώνυμο για να διευκολύνεται ο διάλογος. Μηνύματα τα οποία προσβάλλουν τον συγγραφέα του άρθρου, υβριστικά μηνύματα ή μηνύματα εκτός θέματος θα διαγράφονται. Προτιμήστε την ελληνική γλώσσα αντί για greeklish.